Venue: Committee Rooms 1 and 2 - Civic Centre. View directions
Contact: Sue Lawrence- Democratic Support Officer 023 8083 3569
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies and Changes in Panel Membership (If Any) To note any changes in membership of the Panel made in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 4.3.
Minutes: The Panel noted that Councillor Samuels was in attendance as a nominated substitute for Councillor Mead in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 4.3.
|
|
Report of the Planning and Development Manager detailing an application for a Certificate of Appropriate Alternative Development for land at the former civil service sports ground at Malmesbury Road, attached. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Panel considered the report of the Planning and Development Manager detailing an application for a Certificate of Appropriate Alternative Development for land at the former civil service sports ground at Malmesbury Road. (Copy of the report circulated with the agenda and appended to the signed minutes).
Mr Dineen, Mr Littler and Ms Lloyd (Local Residents) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
RESOLVED that authority be given to the Planning and Development Manager to issue a Section17 Certificate under the Land and Compensation Act 1961 Act confirming that if the land subject of the application for a Certificate of Appropriate Alternative Development were not proposed to be acquired by an authority possessing compulsory purchase powers, planning permission would have been granted for land use within the following classes of the schedule to the Town and Country Planning ( Use Classes Order ) 1987as:- (i) D1c (non residential institutional for the provision of outdoor sports associated with education); and/or (ii) D2e (assembly and leisure for outdoor sports) and not for any other use - including C3 (residential) in full or in part - for the reasons set out in appendix 1 of the report being the draft Certificate.
|
|
Enforcement Report in respect of 141 Burgess Road, Bassett, Southampton PDF 692 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager regarding an unauthorised change of use in respect of 141 Burgess Road, attached. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Panel considered the report of the Planning and Development Manager regarding an unauthorised change of use in respect of 141 Burgess Road from single, four-bedroom dwelling to use primarily as an office, to business use. (Copy of the report circulated with the agenda and appended to the signed minutes).
Mr Holmes (Quayside Architects) was present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
The Panel considered the revised officer recommendation for (1) a deferral of the service of an enforcement notice to enable the submission of an application for temporary planning permission within 1 month for a period of 5 years for a live work unit together with the submission of a unilateral undertaking to complete the build of the additional consented dwelling to the rear of the plot within 2 years and (2) subject to (1) to rescind the resolution to take enforcement action
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE REVISED OFFICER RECOMMENDATION WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE:
FOR: Councillors Jones, Letts, Osmond, Slade and Thomas AGAINST: Councillor Fitzhenry
RESOLVED
(i) that the service of an Enforcement Notice be deferred to enable the submission of a valid planning application for a change of use of 141 Burgess Road to a live-work unit within one month of the date of this meeting and the application be subject to the following:- 1. be time limited to a period of 5 years; 2. include a unilateral undertaking requiring the completion of the dwelling at the rear of the site (LPA ref 07/01817/FUL) to be to a habitable standard within 24 months of the date of decision; 3. be personal to the current owner of the site; 4. include the provision of two car parking spaces to the rear of the property before the planning permission is implemented; and
(ii) that the resolutions passed at meetings of the Planning and Rights of Way Panel on 23rd November 2010 and 27th May 2008 to serve an Enforcement Notice in respect of this property be rescinded in the event that planning permission is granted for a live-work unit in the terms set out above”..
NOTE: Councillor Samuels declared a prejudicial interest in the above item and withdrew from the meeting.
|
|
Consideration of Planning Applications Copy of all reports circulated with the agenda and appended to the signed minutes.
|
|
Portswood Bus Depot, 224 Portswood Road, SO17 2AD - 10/01399/OUT PDF 2 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending delegated authority be granted in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Redevelopment of the site to provide a new supermarket (Class A1 retail 9,730 square metres gross floorspace with associated 344 space car park, new community use (Class D1 1,166 square metres gross floorspace) and public play area (no matters reserved for later approval) and 59 residential units (29 houses and 30 flats) with 49 associated car parking spaces (details of landscaping and appearance reserved for later approval)
Mr Cundale and Mr Brown (Agents) and Dr Buckle, Mr Claisse, Mr Gillan and Mrs Jameson (Local Residents / Objectors) and Councillor Vinson (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
The Panel noted a change to the description of development, confirming that landscaping was also a reserved matter in terms of the residential element.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT ENTERING INTO A SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENT WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE:
FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Letts, Osmond and Thomas AGAINST: Councillors Samuels and Slade
RESOLVED (i) that authority be delegated to the Planning and Development Manager to grant conditional planning approval subject to:- (a) the Secretary of State for the Environment not requiring the decision to be referred to him under the terms of the Town and Country Planning Shopping Direction; (b) the applicant entering into a Section 106 Legal Agreement to secure:- 1. either a financial contribution towards site specific transport contributions for highway and pedestrian facilityimprovements in the vicinity of the site; or provision to implement an agreed series of works under S.278 of the Highways Act in line with policies SDP4 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006), CS18 and CS25 of the City of Southampton Core Strategy (January 2010) and the adopted SPG relating to Planning Obligations (August 2005 as amended); 2. the provision of an on-site equipped children’s play area prior to first occupation of the retail unit; 3. the submission, approval and implementation of public art that is consistent with the Council’s Public Art ‘Art People Places’ Strategy; 4. the submission, approval and implementation of a Green Travel Plan (GTP) to address the impact of the parking provision so that it can be assessed along with the transport needs of the development; 5. a commitment to local labour and employment initiatives both during the construction phase and post completion; 6. the submission of a highway condition survey; 7. the funding of any Traffic Regulation Orders required for the above measures and to enable the development to be implemented; 8. the provision of an unencumbered access for cyclists and pedestrians linking Belmont Road and Portswood Road prior to first occupation of the retail unit; 9. improvements to the public realm in the vicinity of the site; 10.the provision of affordable housing in accordance with policy CS15 of the City of Southampton Core Strategy (January 2010); 11.contributions towards the provision of or improvements to public open space; 12.management of the car-park ... view the full minutes text for item 106. |
|
University of Southampton, Boldrewood Campus, Bassett Crescent East - 10/01058/FUL PDF 1 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Erection of a single storey detached building to house plant and equipment for the electricity supply to the campus - description amended following validation and receipt of amended plans.
Mr Reay (Agent), Mrs Cowie and Mr Moore (Local Residents) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that planning approval be granted subject to the conditions in the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Following the receipt of amended plans, the proposed buildings are considered to respect the visual amenities of Bassett Avenue whilst satisfying initial highway safety concerns. Other material considerations, such as those listed in the report to the Council’s Planning and Rights of Way Panel on 18th January 2011, do not have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application. In accordance with Section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Planning Permission should therefore be granted. Policies – SDP1, SDP7, SDP9, SDP12, TI2, NE6 and L7 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review - Adopted March 2006 and Policies – CS6, CS11 and CS13 of the Southampton City Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy – Adopted January 2010 as supported by the Council’s current adopted Supplementary Planning Guidance.
|
|
80 Bellemoor Road, SO15 7QU - 10/01654/FUL PDF 921 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Part two storey, part single storey side and rear extensions
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that planning approval be granted subject to the conditions in the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. The proposed extension is not considered to be harmful to the appearance of the host dwelling nor harmful to the character of the surrounding. No harm would result to the amenities of neighbours. Other material considerations have been considered and are not judged to have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application, and where applicable conditions have been applied in order to satisfy these matters. The scheme is therefore judged to be in accordance with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and thus planning permission should therefore be granted. Policies - SDP1, SDP7 and SDP9 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and CS13 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010).
|