We urge Southampton City Council to:
• Review the decision to halt fire safety and building improvement works at Holcroft House that were already in progress, up until January 2023, and check that due process was followed in stopping the works.
• Call senior council officers to the relevant public
council meeting to explain to elected members and the public why it
was deemed necessary to halt the agreed fire safety and building
improvement works at Holcroft House.
• Follow the Best Interest Assessments for each resident at
Holcroft House.
• Allow residents to stay in Holcroft House as previously
decided and in accordance with their best interest and risk
assessments while the necessary works are undertaken on a phased
basis, giving residents consistency and security in the medium and
long-term and to preserve the longevity of the care home for future
residents.
• Use the income from the sale of the Glen Lee site to fund
the necessary works at Holcroft House.
• Complete an Equality and Safety Impact Assessment to ensure
that any decisions do not cause detriment to or discriminate
against groups of people with protected characteristics under the
Equality Act 2010 and that the Council complies with the Public
Sector Equality Duty.
• Provide the rationale for the permanent closure of Holcroft
House along with alternatives to the closure with the associated
costings for the Council and public to consider.
• Forecast the financial impact to residents and their
families, as well as Southampton City Council in the scenario that
Holcroft House was closed and where residents could not afford to
fund their care. We understand that private residential care costs
more than Local Authority residential care and in the long-term,
and where residents don’t/won’t have money to pay for
their care, Southampton City Council have to pay. This will put
increased cost pressure onto the Council and will put current
residents, and those who would’ve been resident in the
future, in a worse financial position.
• Check the financial figures used to inform the closure
proposal, and compare the cost of care provided by the Council with
equivalent care packages (including the amount of contact time
between carers and residents) provided by private care providers to
ensure the accuracy of projected costs and savings.
The NHS Southampton City Clinical Commissioning Group and Southampton City Council’s Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2017-2025 https://www.southampton.gov.uk/media/g5ipm3yf/health-and-wellbeing-strategy_tcm63-391952.pdf states that one of their principles is to “Deliver services that are personalised, safe, effective and value for money”. We believe that keeping Holcroft House open is in line with this principle, but the closure is not.
Retaining Holcroft House also contributes to the availability of
affordable housing for older people in the city of
Southampton.
We also believe that keeping Holcroft House open and undertaking
the relevant maintenance and safety work is necessary in the
fulfilment of the Council's Corporate Plan 2022-30
https://www.southampton.gov.uk/media/ugshrc2w/corporate-plan-final-51222.pdf
Key commitments in the Council’s Corporate Plan that are
relevant to residents and employees at Holcroft House are under the
heading of ‘Strong Foundations for Life’. The Council
has stated that:
• “We are committed to reducing inequalities
including in wages, earnings, health and wellbeing.”
• “We will work to improve the health and wellbeing of
local people, focusing on tackling health inequalities. Helping to
facilitate life-long learning and skills development will encourage
higher-skilled, higher-paid jobs for Southampton
residents.”
• “We will protect and promote the physical and mental
health and wellbeing of everyone who lives, works and learns in
Southampton.”
• “Southampton residents earn on average less than those
that work in the city, but live outside it. We are committed
to… ensure more Southampton residents have higher-skilled,
higher-paid jobs in the city, by supporting them throughout their
lives through education, skills development and
jobs…”
This ePetition ran from 28/06/2023 to 20/09/2023 and has now finished.
263 people signed this ePetition.
The Petition closed on 18th September 2023 having received a combined total of 1,600 signatures. Under the Council’s Procedure Rules it was a qualifying petition that must be debated at Council irrespective of whether the matter was to be decided elsewhere, in this case at Cabinet on 19th September.
Given the matter was before Cabinet on 19th September, the Lord
Mayor granted consent for the Petition to be debated at Council on
20th September.