Venue: Committee Rooms 1 and 2 - Civic Centre
Contact: Pat Wood- Democratic Support Officer 023 8083 2302
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Including Matters Arising) PDF 81 KB To approve and sign as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 19th July 2011 and to deal with any matters arising, attached.
Minutes: RESOLVED that the Minutes of the Meeting held on 19th July 2011 be approved and signed as a correct record.
CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS
Copy of all reports circulated with the agenda and appended to the signed minutes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Unit A, Bakers Wharf, 20-40 Millbank Street 11/01007/FUL PDF 1 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending approval be refused in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Additional documents:
Minutes: Retention of use for the production of sheet plastic (Class B2 - general industrial use) together with the retention of associated elevational changes including 8 grilles to northern facade and noise attenuated vents to roof.
Mr Patrick (Agent), Mr Reay (Interested Party), Ms Salomon-Olsen (Chamber of Commerce), Ms Tarandip (Local Resident) and Councillor Barnes-Andrews (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION (1) TO REFUSE PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE FOR: Councillors Mrs Blatchford, Claisse, L Harris, Osmond and Thomas AGAINST: Councillors Jones and Cunio
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION (2) TO INSTITUTE COURT PROCEEDINGS WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE FOR: Councillors Jones, Mrs Blatchford, Claisse, L Harris, Osmond and Thomas ABSTAINED: Councillor Cunio
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION (3) TO PROVIDE THE APPLICANT WITH AN UPDATED LIST OF AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED
(i) that planning permission be refused for the reason set out below; (ii) that Court proceedings should be instituted to prosecute the breach of the Enforcement Notice, to secure the cessation of the unauthorised use for the manufacture of plastic products; and, (iii) that the applicant be provided with an updated list of available commercial property suitable for relocation.
REASONS FOR REFUSAL
The retention of this general industrial use, operating on a 24 hour a day basis for most days of the year is considered to be injurious to the residential amenities of those living in the Northam Estate opposite the site during the late evening and early morning hours, especially during still, dry weather conditions, by reason of adverse noise impact. Notwithstanding the works which have been undertaken to seek to mitigate noise impact, a number of site visits have revealed a low continuous tonal hum is still present, with intermittent noise episodes, such as a bell ringing when certain plant is in operation, clearly distinguished above background noise levels in the immediate area. The council, as local planning authority, is mindful that such disturbance has been present since 2002; the use is unlawful and has generated complaints, substantiated by noise monitoring. Two planning Appeals have been dismissed, the latter to an Enforcement Notice, which the Inspector upheld and which the applicant has breached. The last Inspector was not prepared to impose mitigating conditions without the certainty of such mitigation working. Officers have also witnessed a side fire exit door being left open and consider that conditions requiring openings to be kept shut during certain hours, deliveries not to be received during certain hours and on-going maintenance of plant to involve an intolerable level of supervision, where the basic test of enforceability is therefore in grave doubt. The council notes the local employment Baba Trading provides, but in overall terms considers the harm from this use continuing on a 24 hour a day basis to be harmful to the amenities of those living close by. As such, the proposals are considered to be ... view the full minutes text for item 32. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
The Boathouse, The Triangle, Cobden Bridge 10/01041/FUL PDF 1 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending delegated authority be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Redevelopment of the site. Erection of a part 4, part 5, and part 6-storey building to provide 51 sheltered housing flats for the elderly (36 x one bedroom and 15 x two bedroom units) with associated parking and a riverside walk.
Mr Child (Agent), Mr Chapman (Dellwharf Residents Society Limited), Mrs Badham (Police) and Mrs Covall (Local Resident) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT ENTERING INTO A SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENT WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Jones, Mrs Blatchford, Claisse, L Harris, Osmond and Thomas AGAINST: Councillor Cunio
RESOLVED
Additional Conditions
31 Age restriction
Occupation of the development shall be limited to persons of over 60 years old or where there are two or more persons resident, then at least one person shall be over 60 and the remaining occupants shall be at least 55 years old.
REASON: The Council has had regard to the special circumstances of this residential development in terms of car parking arrangements, amenity space and housing mix as set out in adopted policy CS16 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010) and is prepared to grant permission on a restricted basis only.
32 Highway ... view the full minutes text for item 33. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Boldrewood Campus, Bassett Crescent East 11/00963/TIME PDF 2 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending delegated authority be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Additional documents:
Minutes: Extension of time to implement previous planning permission (ref 07/00985/OUT) to redevelop the site with new buildings of up to 32,000 square metres floor space for University purposes, 468 car parking spaces, landscaping, temporary and permanent access arrangements, including a new vehicular access from Burgess Road and ancillary works (outline application seeking approval for access arrangements).
Mr Reay (Agent), Mrs Cowie and Mrs Wawman (Local Residents) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT ENTERING INTO A SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENT WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Jones, Mrs Blatchford, Claisse, Cunio, Osmond and Thomas AGAINST: Councillor L Harris
RESOLVED
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development relates to the extension in time of the planning permission 07/00985/OUT that was approved by the City Council in June 2008 following the completion of a S.106 Legal Agreement. It is again acceptable taking into ... view the full minutes text for item 34. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
130 Portsmouth Road 11/00802/FUL PDF 2 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending conditional approval be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Erection of a part single-storey, part three-storey rear extension to facilitate conversion from a three bedroom dwelling to 5 flats (4x two-bed and 1x three-bed) with car parking to the front and rear.
Mr Sayle (Agent), Mr Cook and Ms Fox (Local Residents) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Jones, Claisse, Mrs Blatchford, Osmond AGAINST: Councillor Cunio and Councillor L Harris ABSTAINED: Councillor Thomas
RESOLVED that conditional planning permission be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the additional condition set out below.
Additional Condition
15 Lighting
A written lighting scheme including light scatter diagram with relevant contours shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to implementation of the lighting scheme. The scheme must demonstrate compliance with table 1 "Obtrusive Light Limitations for Exterior Lighting Installations", by the Institution of Lighting Engineers Guidance Notes for the Reduction of Obtrusive Light 2005. The installation must be maintained in accordance with the agreed written scheme.
REASON: To protect the amenities of the occupiers of existing nearby residential properties.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Overall the scheme is acceptable and the level of development proposed will not result in an adverse impact on the amenities enjoyed by surrounding occupiers or to the character and appearance of the area. A suitable balance has been achieved between securing additional housing, parking, on-site amenity space and landscaping, whilst ensuring that existing residential amenity is protected. Other material considerations do not have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application. In accordance with Section 38 (6) of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 Planning Permission should therefore be granted.
Policies SDP1, SDP4, SDP5, SDP7, SDP9, H1, H2 and H7 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and Policies CS4, CS5, CS13, CS16, CS19, CS20 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy (January 2010); National Planning Guidance contained within PPS1 (Delivering Sustainable Development), PPS3 (Housing 2010) and PPG13 (Transport) are also relevant to the determination of this planning application. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2 Nightingale Grove and 34 Nightingale Road 11/00443/TIME PDF 2 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending delegated authority be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Extension of time to implement planning permission 07/01656/FUL. (Erection of 9 x three-bedroom dwellings within 2 part two/part three-storey terraced blocks with associated parking and amenity space).
Mr Chalke, Mr Haskell, Ms Lloyd, Mr Rabbetts (Local Residents) and Councillor Moulton (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT ENTERING INTO A SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENT WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Jones, Mrs Blatchford, Claisse and Osmond AGAINST: Councillors Cunio, L Harris and Thomas
RESOLVED
Amended Conditions
3 Boundary Treatment
No further development shall take place until details of retaining walls to be constructed are submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority in writing. Before the development hereby approved first comes into ... view the full minutes text for item 36. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
30 High Road 11/00437/FUL PDF 1 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending conditional approval be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Erection of 2-storey, 1 x 4 and 1 x 3-bed, semi-detached houses with accommodation in the roof space, rear dormer windows, associated parking and refuse/cycle storage.
Mr Poswall (Applicant), Mrs Lisle (Local Resident) and Councillor Vassiliou (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
Officers recommended an amendment to condition no 11 and three additional conditions in respect of land contamination, detailed below:
Amend condition 11: APPROVAL CONDITION – Refuse and Cycle Storage [performance condition] The store for plot A for the refuse containers and cycles and the access to them shall be provided in accordance with the details hereby approved before the development first comes into occupation and thereafter retained as approved. Before the development hereby approved first comes into occupation, revised details of the bin and cycle storage for plot B shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for approval in writing. The storage shall be provided prior to first occupation and thereafter retained as approved.
Reason: To secure a satisfactory form of development
Additional Conditions: APPROVAL CONDITION- Land Contamination investigation and remediation [Pre-Commencement & Occupation Condition] Prior to the commencement of development approved by this planning permission (or such other date or stage in development as may be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority), a scheme to deal with the risks associated with contamination of the site shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. That scheme shall include all of the following phases, unless identified as unnecessary by the preceding phase and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority:
1. A desk top study including; · historical and current sources of land contamination · results of a walk-over survey identifying any evidence of land contamination · identification of the potential contaminants associated with the above · an initial conceptual site model of the site indicating sources, pathways and receptors · a qualitative assessment of the likely risks · any requirements for exploratory investigations.
2. A report of the findings of an exploratory site investigation, characterising the site and allowing for potential risks (as identified in phase 1) to be assessed.
3. A scheme of remediation detailing the remedial actions to be taken and how they will be implemented.
On completion of the works set out in (3) a verification report shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority confirming the remediation actions that have been undertaken in accordance with the approved scene of remediation and setting out any measures for maintenance, further monitoring, reporting and arrangements for contingency action. The verification report shall be approved by the Local Planning Authority prior to the occupation or operational use of any stage of the development. Any changes to these agreed elements require the express consent of the local planning authority.
Reason: To ensure land contamination risks associated with the site are appropriately investigated and assessed with respect to human health and the wider environment and where required remediation of the site is to an appropriate standard.
APPROVAL CONDITION - Use of uncontaminated ... view the full minutes text for item 37. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
241 Aldermoor Road 11/00447/FUL PDF 1 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending conditional approval be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Change of Use of ground floor to hot food takeaway (Class A5).
Mr Pottiwal (Applicant) and Ms Dyer (Local Resident) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
Councillor Thomas (Ward Councillor) was present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting. After speaking Councillor Thomas withdrew from the meeting and was not present for the determination of this item.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that conditional planning permission be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the additional condition set out below.
Additional Condition
6 APPROVAL CONDITION - Extract Ventilation - control of noise, fumes and odour
No cooking process shall take place until and unless the approved scheme for the control of noise, fumes and odours from extractor fans and other equipment has been installed and operated and thereafter maintained in full working order. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details and findings. REASON: To protect the amenities of the occupiers of existing nearby properties.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The principle of a change of use of from the currently vacant A1 shop to an A5 takeaway use is acceptable and this would contribute to the viability of the local parade and street activity during the daytime without an adverse impact on public amenity and highway safety. The change of use would not be materially harmfulto visual amenity and therefore compliant with “saved” Policies SDP1 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and Policy CS3 and CS13 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010). Subject to the imposition of the suggested conditions attached to this report, the proposal would be acceptable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
8 Sherborne Road 11/00753/FUL PDF 2 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending conditional approval be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Erection of a part single storey and part two storey rear extension and single storey side extension (Resubmission 11/00264/FUL).
Mr Gillen (Highfield Residents’ Association), Ms Blue (Local Resident) and Councillors Claisse and Vinson (Ward Councillors) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Jones, Mrs Blatchford, L Harris, Osmond and Thomas AGAINST: Councillor Cunio
RESOLVED that conditional planning permission be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the additional condition set out below.
Additional Condition
06 Restricted number of occupants
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended) or any Order amending, revoking or re-enacting that Order, the number of occupants at 8 Sherborne Road shall not exceed five.
REASON: To prevent an over intensified use of the property in the interest of preventing actual and perceived fear of harm to residential amenity within the area caused by a sixth person living within the property, given the high proportion of properties in the area which are used as houses in multiple occupation and the limited car parking available on site and on-street in the general area.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Other material considerations including impact on the appearance of the host dwelling, character and appearance of the area and residential amenities (including the intensification of use) have been considered and are not judged to have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application, and where applicable conditions have been applied in order to satisfy these matters. The scheme is therefore judged to be in accordance with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and thus planning permission should therefore be granted.
Policies - SDP1 (i) (ii), SDP7 (iv) and SDP9 (i) (v) of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and CS13 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010).
NOTE: Councillor Claisse declared an interest and withdrew from the meeting for the determination of this item. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
36 Omdurman Road 11/00892/FUL PDF 1 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending conditional approval be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Erection of a part two-storey, part single-storey side extension.
Mr Faulk (Applicant), Mr Gillen (Highfield Residents’ Association), Mr Holloway, Mr Gundlach (Local Residents) and Councillor Vinson (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Jones, Mrs Blatchford, Cunio, Osmond and Thomas AGAINST: Councillors Claisse and L Harris
RESOLVED that conditional planning permission be granted subject to the conditions in the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Other material considerations including impact on appearance of the host dwelling, character and appearance of the area and residential amenities in terms of a loss of privacy, outlook and overshadowing have been considered and are not judged to have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application, and where applicable conditions have been applied in order to satisfy these matters. The scheme is therefore judged to be in accordance with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and thus planning permission should therefore be granted.
Policies - SDP1, SDP7 and SDP9 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and CS13 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
8 Grosvenor Close 11/00871/FUL PDF 1 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending conditional approval be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Erection of a single-storey rear and side extension (existing garage to be demolished) (resubmission of 11/00379/FUL).
Mr Banyard (Agent), Mr Gillen (Highfield Residents’ Association) and Councillor Vinson (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that conditional planning permission be granted subject to the conditions in the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Other material considerations including impact on appearance of the host dwelling, character and appearance of the area and residential amenities in terms of a loss of privacy, outlook and overshadowing have been considered and are not judged to have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application, and where applicable conditions have been applied in order to satisfy these matters. The scheme is therefore judged to be in accordance with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and thus planning permission should therefore be granted.
Policies - SDP1, SDP7 and SDP9 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and CS13 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010).
NOTE: Councillor Claisse declared a prejudicial interest in the above item and withdrew from the meeting. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
73 Milton Road 11/00754/FUL PDF 1 MB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending conditional approval be granted in respect of an application for a proposed development at the above address, attached. Minutes: Erection of a single storey rear extension.
Officers recommended that the application be deferred to enable the description of development to be amended to read ‘Replacement two storey extension and part single storey rear extension’
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO DEFER WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that the item be deferred. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rosebank Cottage and land adjoining including part of former playing fields, Studland Road PDF 82 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending delegated authority to grant planning permission subject to receipt of an undertaking from the Head of Property and Procurement Services, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: Re-development of the site. Demolition of Rosebank Cottage and erection of 31 dwellings (12 x two-bedroom flats, 7 x two-bedroom houses, 10 x three bedroom houses and 2 x 4 bedroom houses) with associated access and parking, includes closure of part of the public highway in Studland Road (Outline application seeking approval for access, layout and scale).
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF AN UNDERTAKING FROM THE HEAD OF PROPERTY AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES THAT THE TRIPARTITE CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF LAND BE CONDITIONAL UPON RAGLAN HOUSING ASSOCIATION OR ANY OTHER SUBSEQUENT LANDOWNER ENTERING INTO A S106 AGREEMENT SIMULTANEOUSLY TO THE LAND TRANSFER WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Jones, Mrs Blatchford, Claisse, Cunio, L Harris and Osmond AGAINST: Councillor Thomas
RESOLVED that:
(a) approval be given for the stopping up of that piece of public highway in Studland Road forming the existing site access under Section 257 of the Town and Country Planning Act necessary to allow the development to proceed;
(b) conditional planning permission be granted subject to the receipt of an undertaking from the Head of Property and Procurement Services that the tripartite contract for the sale of the land owned by the Council and Mr Daniel Grimes, the subjects of this application, will be conditional upon Raglan Housing Association or any other subsequent landowner entering into a S106 agreement with the Council simultaneously to the land transfer to secure the following:-
i. Financial contributions towards site specific transport contributions for highway improvements in the vicinity of the site in line with Policy SDP4 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006), policies CS18 and CS25 of the adopted LDF Core Strategy (2010) and the adopted SPG relating to Planning Obligations (August 2005 as amended);
ii. A financial contribution towards strategic transport projects for highway network improvements in the wider area as set out in the Local Transport Plan and appropriate SPG/D;
iii. Financial contributions towards the relevant elements of public open space required by the development in line with polices CLT3, CLT5, CLT6 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006), Policies CS21 CS25 of the adopted LDF Core Strategy (2010) and the adopted SPG relating to Planning Obligations (August 2005 as amended), to mitigate for the loss of that part of the site which is currently protected open space:- · Amenity Open Space (“open space”); · Playing Field; · Play space/equipment;
iv. The provision of 35% of the dwellings as affordable housing, in accordance with Policy CS15 of the adopted LDF Core Strategy (2010);
v. Submission of a highway condition survey to ensure any damage to the adjacent highway network attributable to the build process is repaired by the developer; and
REASONS FOR DECISION
Following the Panel resolution of the 31st August 2010, the Council has been unable to secure one of the mortgagee’s, linked with the parcel of land owned by ... view the full minutes text for item 43. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Parking Standards Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) PDF 62 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager seeking the Panel’s views on the draft Parking Standards Supplementary Planning Document, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel received and noted the report of the Planning and Development Manager in respect of the Supplementary Planning Document setting out vehicle and cycle parking outside the defined City Centre area. (Copy of the report circulated with the agenda and attached to the signed minutes).
The Panel discussed and endorsed the report which will be presented to Cabinet, with the request that sufficient consideration be given to vehicles of alternative fuel types.
|