Venue: Committee Rooms 1 and 2 - Civic Centre. View directions
Contact: Sue Lawrence- Democratic Support Officer 023 8083 3569
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Including Matters Arising) PDF 17 KB To approve and sign as a correct record the Minutes of the meetings held on 28th September 2010 and 26th October 2010 and to deal with any matters arising, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes:
RESOLVED that the Minutes of the meetings held on 28th September 2010 and 26th October 2010 be approved and signed as a correct record.
|
|
Consideration of Planning Applications Copy of all reports circulated with the agenda and appended to the signed minutes. |
|
Cedar Press Ltd, Royal Crescent Road - 08 01791 FUL PDF 460 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: Re-development of the site to provide a 100 bedroom hotel and 122 flats (65 x one bedroom, 51 x two bedroom and 6 x three bedroom) in a 25 storey building with associated landscaping, parking and access
Mr Sayle (Agent) was present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENT COMPLETED 7TH SEPTEMBER 2010, WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE:
FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Mead, Osmond and Thomas ABSTAINED: Councillor Letts
RESOLVED that conditional planning approval be granted subject to:-
(i) the conditions as previously agreed by the Planning and Rights of Way Panel on 26th May 2009 and the additional conditions below; and (ii) in conjunction with the Section 106 legal agreement completed 7th September 2010.
Additional Conditions:
30 – Balcony Details Prior to any development commencing, detailed plans of the balcony details shall be approved in writing with the Local Planning Authority at not less than 1:20 scale which include under balcony supports, hand-rails and the relationship of the glazed balcony finish with cladded balcony finish. The development shall proceed in accordance with the agreed details, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. REASON To ensure the development is undertaken in a satisfactory manner.
31– Material Treatment of Balconies Notwithstanding the plans approved, prior to the commencement of the development a schedule of the material treatment of the balconies shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for approval in writing. The details shall include reversing the areas of glazed balconies with the areas which have clad with Rockpanel finish. The development shall proceed in accordance with the agreed details, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. REASON In the interests of the visual amenity of the development.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. The principal of a tall building in this location, the relationship to the adjacent Conservation Area and Listed Buildings, and the potential for influencing the ecology of the area have been assessed as acceptable and appropriate in relation to this scheme. Notwithstanding the concerns raised by English Heritage, the development would make a positive addition to the Southampton Skyline and the amendments to the balconies as secured by planning condition would improve the appearance of the building. Other material considerations do not have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application. In accordance with Section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Planning permission should therefore be granted. Policies - SDP1, SDP4, SDP5, SDP6, SDP7, SDP8, SDP9, SDP10, SDP11, SDP12, SDP13, SDP14, SDP16, SDP17, SDP22, NE4, HE1,HE3, CLT1, CLT5, CLT6, H1 , H2 and MSA1 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review Adopted Version (March 2006). Policies CS1, CS4, CS5, CS6, CS13, CS14, CS15. CS16, CS18, CS19, CS20, CS22, CS23 and ... view the full minutes text for item 85. |
|
14 Westwood Road - 10/01013/FUL PDF 425 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Minutes: Retrospective application for change of use from a single dwelling house (Use Class C3) to a 9-bed House in Multiple Occupation (Sui Generis) and a 5-bedroom House in Multiple Occupation (Use Class C4)
Mrs Barter (Local Resident) and Mr Claisse (Highfield Residents Association) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE:
FOR: Councillors Jones, Letts, Mead, Osmond and Thomas ABSTAINED: Councillor Fitzhenry
RESOLVED that planning approval be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the amended conditions set out below.
Amended Conditions
3 - Landscaping, lighting and means of enclosure detailed plan Notwithstanding the submitted details within one month of the date of this consent, a detailed landscaping scheme and implementation timetable shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority which includes: (i) proposed finished ground levels or contours; means of enclosure; car parking layouts; other vehicle pedestrian access and circulations areas, hard surfacing materials, structures and ancillary objects (refuse bins, lighting columns etc.); (ii) planting plans; written specifications (including cultivation and other operations associated with plant and grass establishment); schedules of plants, noting species, plant sizes and proposed numbers/planting densities where appropriate; (iii) an accurate plot of all trees to be retained and to be lost. Any trees to be lost shall be replaced on a favourable basis (a two-for one basis unless circumstances dictate otherwise); (iv) details of any proposed boundary treatment, including retaining walls; and (v) a landscape management scheme. Any trees, shrubs, seeded or turfed areas which die, fail to establish, are removed or become damaged or diseased, within a period of 5 years from the date of planting shall be replaced by the Developer in the next planting season with others of a similar size and species unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation. The Developer shall be responsible for any replacements for a period of 5 years from the date of planting.
The approved hard and soft landscaping scheme (including parking) for the whole site shall be carried out prior to occupation of the building or during the first planting season following the full completion of building works, whichever is sooner. The approved scheme implemented shall be maintained for a minimum period of 5 years following its complete provision. REASON: To improve the appearance of the site and enhance the character of the development in the interests of visual amenity, to ensure that the development makes a positive contribution to the local environment and, in accordance with the duty required of the Local Planning Authority by Section 197 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
5 – Restriction on number of occupiers The Sui Generis House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) shall only be used for a maximum of 9 residents and for no other purpose unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority and the Use Class C4 HMO ... view the full minutes text for item 86. |
|
5 Northwood Close - 10/01311/FUL PDF 308 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Minutes: Addition of a new first floor to the existing building to facilitate conversion into 1x3-Bed and 3x2-Bed Flats with associated parking and cycle/refuse storage (description of development amended following amended plans received on 18th November 2010)
Mr Foster-Rice (Agent) Mr Moied (Applicant), Mr Tucker (Local Resident) and Councillors Harris and Samuels (Ward Councillors) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
The Panel noted the revised officer recommendation, to delegate authority to the Planning and Development Manager to grant conditional permission upon the expiry of the reconsultation period provided that no new material considerations were raised, owing to the decision to reconsult following the submission of amended plans resulting in a material change to the description of development representing a lesser form of development in terms of the mix of accommodation.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE AMENDED OFFICER RECOMMENDATION THAT AUTHORITY BE DELEGATED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION PROVIDED THAT NO NEW MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS ARE RAISED DURING THE 14 DAY RE-CONSULTATION PERIOD, WAS CARRIED WITH THE CHAIR’S SECOND AND CASTING VOTE
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Letts and Thomas AGAINST: Councillors Jones, Mead and Osmond
RESOLVED that authority be delegated to the Planning and Development Manager to grant conditional planning approval subject to:-
(i) the conditions in the report and the amended and additional conditions set out below; and (ii) no new material considerations following 14 day re consultation period.
Amended Conditions
4 - Amenity Space Access The external amenity space serving the development hereby approved, and pedestrian access to it, shall be made available as a communal area prior to the first occupation of the development hereby permitted and shall be retained with access to it at all times for the use of the flat units numbered 3 and 4, except for the external private amenity spaces allocated to the flat units numbered 1 and 2 in accordance with the approved plans received by the Local Planning Authority on 18th November 2010. REASON: To ensure the provision of adequate amenity space in association with the approved flats.
5 - Landscaping, lighting and means of enclosure detailed plan Notwithstanding the submitted details, before the commencement of any site works a detailed landscaping scheme and implementation timetable shall be submitted, for approval in writing by the local planning authority, which includes:-
(i) car parking layouts; other vehicle pedestrian access and circulation areas; (ii) hard surfacing materials, structures and ancillary objects (refuse bins, lighting columns etc.); (iii) details of any proposed means of enclosure/boundary treatment, including retaining walls; The approved details for the whole site shall be carried out prior to occupation of the building and thereafter be retained whilst the building is used for residential purposes. REASON: To improve the appearance of the site and enhance the character of the development in the interests of visual amenity, to ensure that the development makes a positive contribution to the local environment and, in accordance with the duty required of ... view the full minutes text for item 87. |
|
Harcourt Mansions, Whitworth Crescent - 10/00965/FUL PDF 405 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending delegated authority be granted in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Additional documents:
Minutes: Redevelopment of the site. Erection of a part 3-storey part 2-storey building comprising 3x2-bed houses, 1x3-bed house and 3x2-bed flats with associated parking and cycle/refuse storage
Mr Reay (Agent) and Mrs Simmons (ThekchenBuddhist Centre) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT ENTERING INTO A SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENT WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED
(i) that authority be delegated to the Planning and Development Manager to grant conditional planning approval subject to:- (a) the conditions in the report, the amended and additional conditions below; (b) the applicant entering into a Section 106 Legal Agreement to secure: 1. a financial contribution towards the provision of public open space in accordance with Policy CS25 of the Core Strategy (January 2010), Policy CLT5 of the adopted City of Southampton Local Plan and applicable SPG; 2. a financial contribution towards the provision of a new children’s play area and equipment in accordance with policy Policy CS25 of the Core Strategy (January 2010), Policy CLT6 of the adopted City of Southampton Local Plan and applicable SPG; 3. provision of affordable housing in accordance with LDF Core Strategy Policy CS15; 4. site specific transport obligation for highway improvements in the vicinity of the site in accordance with appropriate SPG to encourage sustainability in travel through the use of alternative modes of transport to the private car; 5. a financial contribution towards strategic transport contributions for highway network improvements in the wider area as set out in the Local Transport Plan and appropriate SPG; 6. a highway condition survey to ensure any damage to the adjacent highway network attributable to the build process is repaired by the developer; and
(ii) that the Planning and Development Manager be authorised to refuse permission should the Section 106 Agreement not be completed within two months from the date of determination, on the ground of failure to secure the provisions of the Section 106 Agreement.
Amended Conditions
4 - Landscaping, lighting and means of enclosure detailed plan Notwithstanding the submitted details, before the commencement of any site works a detailed landscaping scheme and implementation timetable shall be submitted for approval in writing by the local planning authority, which includes: (i) proposed finished ground levels or contours; means of enclosure; car parking surface treatment, surface treatment for pedestrian access and circulation areas, all other hard surfacing materials, structures and ancillary objects (refuse bins, lighting columns etc.); (ii) planting plans; written specifications (including cultivation and other operations associated with plant and grass establishment); schedules of plants, noting species, plant sizes and proposed numbers/planting densities where appropriate; (iii) an accurate plot of all trees to be retained and to be lost. Any trees to be lost shall be replaced on a favourable basis (a two-for one basis unless circumstances dictate otherwise); (iv) details of any proposed boundary treatment, including hedges and retaining ... view the full minutes text for item 88. |
|
15 Ripstone Gardens - 10/01296/FUL PDF 424 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: Part two-storey, part single storey side and rear extension to facilitate conversion of existing house into 2 x 3-bed flats with associated parking and cycle/refuse storage
Mr Sayle (Agent), Mr Claisse (Local Resident) and Councillor Vinson (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that planning approval be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the additional condition set out below.
Additional Conditions
12 - Use The flats hereby approved shall only be occupied as a single dwelling house in accordance with Class C3 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 as amended by the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Amendment) (England) Order 2010. The development shall not be occupied as an HMO (including by 3 or more unrelated persons sharing the same basic amenities) without first obtaining planning permission for a change of use. REASON: In the interests of the character of the area.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. The reasons for refusal imposed on decision 10/01296/FUL have been overcome. Other material considerations such as those listed in the report to the Planning and Rights of Way Panel on the 23rd November 2010 do not have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application. The proposed development would be in keeping with the surrounding area and would not have a harmful impact on residential amenity or highway safety where applicable conditions have been applied in order to satisfy these matters. The scheme is therefore judged to be in accordance with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and thus planning permission should therefore be granted. Policies - SDP1, SDP4, SDP5, SDP7, SDP9, SDP10, SDP13 and SDP14 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and CS4, CS6, CS13, CS16, CS18, CS19 and CS20 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010).
|
|
Horseshoe Park, Horseshoe Bridge, SO17 2NP - 10/00946/TIME PDF 328 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Additional documents:
Minutes: Erection of a five-storey office building with associated parking and vehicular access from Drummond Drive (Extension of Time)
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that planning approval be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the additional conditions set out below.
Additional Conditions
21 - Noise Mitigation A scheme of noise mitigation measures to ensure that occupiers are not adversely affected from noise disturbance from the adjacent railway transformer compound shall be submitted and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The agreed scheme shall be implemented prior to first occupation and subsequently retained. REASON: To ensure a satisfactory form of development.
22 - Public Highway Details are to be supplied to ensure that the structural integrity of the public highway will not be undermined either during or after the construction process. REASON: In the interests of public safety
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
The site is safeguarded for light industry and research and development uses under Saved Policy REI11 (xvi) of the Local Plan Review. Whilst office development does not strictly accord with the site specific designation, this use is suitable for the site having regard to the existing permission for office development on the site and having regard to the applicant’s unsuccessful attempts to bring industrial use to the site prior to granting application 08/00083/FUL. The development is acceptable taking into account all other relevant policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Overall the principal scheme is acceptable, particularly as it would bring the site back into employment use. The level of development is appropriate for the site and the form of development is compatible with neighbouring commercial and industrial activities. Other material considerations do not have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application. In accordance with Section 38 (6) of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 Planning Permission should therefore be granted. Policies SDP1, SDP5, SDP7, SDP9, REI11 and REI15 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review - Adopted March 2006 policies CS7, CS8 and CS13 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy (January 2010).
|
|
17 Bassett Heath Avenue - 10/01365/FUL PDF 351 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Minutes: First floor rear extension and erection of car port in front garden
Councillor Samuels (Ward Councillor) was present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that planning approval be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the additional condition set out below.
Additional Condition
10 - Hours of work for Demolition / Clearance / Construction All works relating to the demolition, clearance and construction of the development hereby granted shall only take place between the hours of: Monday to Friday 08:00 hours to 18:00 hours (8.00am to 6.00pm) Saturdays 09:00 hours to 13:00 hours (9.00am to 1.00pm) and at no time on Sundays and recognised public holidays. Any works outside the permitted hours shall be confined to the internal preparations of the buildings without audible noise from outside the building, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. REASON: To protect the amenities of the occupiers of existing nearby residential properties.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. The scale and massing of the first floor extension is proportionate to the scale and appearance of the existing dwelling and its neighbours and is not considered to harm the residential amenity of neighbouring dwellings. The design of the proposed car port is consistent with that of the main dwelling. It will not harm the character of the Bassett Heath Avenue Street scene nor will it affect the residential amenity of neighbouring dwellings. Other material considerations have been considered and are not judged to have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application, and where applicable conditions have been applied in order to satisfy these matters. The scheme is therefore judged to be in accordance with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and thus planning permission should therefore be granted. ‘Saved Policies’ - SDP1, SDP7 and SDP9 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review Adopted March 2006 as supported by the adopted LDF Core Strategy (2010) policy CS13 and the Council’s current adopted Residential Design Guide.
|
|
21 to 25 St Marys Place, SO14 3HY - 10/00948/FUL PDF 323 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Minutes: Change of use from Light Retail/Commercial to a Church (Use Class D1)
Mr Abu (Church Representative / Applicant) was present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED that authority be delegated to the Planning and Development Manager to grant conditional planning approval subject to the conditions in the report and the amended and additional conditions set out below.
Amended Conditions
8 - Acoustic Report Prior to the occupation of the hereby approved planning permission, the mitigation measures proposed by the acoustic report and written scheme to minimise noise shall be implemented in accordance with the approved noise report. The agreed measures from the approved noise report shall be retained thereafter in perpetuity unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. REASON: To protect the amenities of the occupiers of existing nearby properties.
Additional Conditions
11 - Archaeological investigation No development shall take place within the site until a plan which details all proposed ground work associated with additional services has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Where ground works are identified as detailed on the submitted plan an archaeological watching brief shall be implemented in accordance with details to be agreed with by the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of the development. REASON: To ensure that the archaeological investigation is initiated at an appropriate point in the development procedure and owing to the archaeological importance of the site.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Other material considerations including surrounding character, impact on amenity, proximity to surrounding residential properties and nearby land uses have been considered and are not judged to have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application where applicable conditions have been applied in order to satisfy these matters. The scheme is therefore judged to be in accordance with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and thus planning permission should therefore be granted. Policies - SDP1, SDP4, SDP5, SDP10, SDP11, SDP13 and SDP16 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and CS3, CS13, CS19, and CS20 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010).
|
|
Application to modify the Definitive Map and Statement by adding a footpath PDF 69 KB Report of the Head of Planning and Sustainability regarding the addition of a footpath to the definitive Map and Statement of Rights of Way in the vicinity of Lord’s Hill Centre East, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel considered the report of the Head of Planning and Sustainability seeking the determination of the Panel as to whether or not a specified route has accrued public right of way status by presumed dedication, as defined in Section 31 of the Highways Act 1980. (Copy of report circulated with the agenda and attached to the signed minutes).
Mr Moore (Agent for J Sainsburys) Mr Sillence (Chair of Lordshill Residents’ Association) Mr Hodder (Lordshill Community Association), Mr Cantillou, Mrs Hessey and Mr Smith (Local Residents), and Councillors Morrell and Thomas (Ward Councillors) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
RESOLVED that a public right of way subsists over the route specified and has accrued public right of way status by presumed dedication, as defined in Section 31 of the Highways Act 1980 (“the 1980 Act”) and that it should be added to the Definitive Map and Statement. |
|
Enforcement Report in respect of 141 Burgess Road, Bassett, Southampton PDF 117 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager regarding an Enforcement Notice in respect of the unauthorised use of 141 Burgess Road, attached.
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Panel considered the report of the Planning and Development Manager regarding an Enforcement Notice in respect of the unauthorised use of 141 Burgess Road from single, four bedroomed dwelling to use primarily as an office to an architectural practice / property development company / consultant. (Copy of report circulated with the agenda and attached to the signed minutes).
Mr Holmes (Quayside Architects) and Councillor Samuels (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
RESOLVED
(i) that authority be granted to the Planning and Development Manager in consultation with the Solicitor to the Council to serve an Enforcement Notice, requiring the unauthorised use of 141 Burgess Road primarily as an office to cease; (ii) that service of the Notice be deferred for at least 1 month to allow discussions between the owner and Planning and Development Manager as to whether any other way forward might exist; (iii) that should the unauthorised use not cease that authority be given to prosecute such a breach of control via the Magistrates Court; and (iv) that assistance be offered to the business(es) operating from the address to find alternative accommodation authorised for office use.
|
|
Riverdene Place, Whitworth Crescent - Breach of the Section 106 Agreement PDF 66 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager regarding a breach of the Section 106 Agreement in respect of public footpath access to the waterfront via Whitworth Crescent, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: (Copy of report circulated with the agenda and attached to the signed minutes).
RESOLVED that the item be deferred pending further discussions with the freehold owner. |
|
Review of 1App requirements in respect of the validation of planning applications PDF 98 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager regarding a review of requirements in respect of the validation of planning applications, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel considered the report of the Planning and Development Manager regarding a review of requirements in respect of the validation of planning applications. (Copy of report circulated with the agenda and attached to the signed minutes).
RESOLVED
(i) that interim approval be given for the use of the revised validation criteria for the various types of 1 App application form as set out in Appendix 1 of the report, in terms of the validation of all new planning applications received from 1 January 2011; and (ii) that approval be given for an 8 week consultation exercise with local agents and the public who use the Planning Service as well as internal and external consultees, to seek their opinion on the revised local validation criteria. |