Venue: Committee Rooms 1 and 2 - Civic Centre. View directions
Contact: Sue Lawrence- Democratic Support Officer 023 8083 3569
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies and Changes in Panel Membership (If Any) To note any changes in membership of the Panel made in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 4.3.
Minutes: The Panel noted that Councillor Samuels was in attendance as a nominated substitute for Councillor Mead in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 4.3.
|
|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Including Matters Arising) PDF 118 KB To approve and sign as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 21st December 2010 and to deal with any matters arising, attached.
Minutes: RESOLVED that the Minutes of the meeting held on 21st December 2010 be approved and signed as a correct record subject to the following amendment to Minute 101 - 5 Northwood Close SO16 3QJ - 10/01311/FUL
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Letts and Thomas AGAINST: Councillors Osmond and Slade
|
|
Consideration of Planning Applications Copy of all reports circulated with the agenda and appended to the signed minutes.
|
|
Land to the rear of 70 Shirley Avenue -10/01749/FUL PDF 416 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Minutes: Erection of a detached 3 bed property to rear of existing property (resubmission of 09/01154/FUL to provide a widened integral garage and reconfigured layout)
Mr Cope (Applicant) and Mr Wiseman (Local Resident) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Letts, Osmond and Thomas ABSTAINED: Councillors Samuels and Slade
RESOLVED that planning approval be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the amended and additional conditions set out below.
Amended Condition
10 – No other windows No other windows, doors or openings shall be constructed above ground floor level in the side elevations of the dwelling hereby approved. REASON In the interests of the privacy of the neighbouring properties
Additional Condition
19 - Renewable Energy - Micro-Renewables An assessment of the development’s total energy demand and a feasibility study for the inclusion of renewable energy technologies on the site, that will achieve a reduction in CO2 emissions [of at least 20%] must be conducted. Plans for the incorporation of renewable energy technologies to the scale that is demonstrated to be feasible by the study, and that will reduce the CO2 emissions of the development [by at least 20%] must be submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of the development (excluding the demolition phase) hereby granted consent. Renewable technologies that meet the agreed specifications must be installed and rendered fully operational prior to the first occupation of the development hereby granted consent and retained thereafter. REASON To reduce the impact of the development on climate change and finite energy resources and to comply with adopted policy CS20 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document Adopted Version (January 2010).
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan and other guidance. Other material considerations such as those listed in the report to the Planning and Rights of Way Panel on the 15.02.11 do not have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application. The proposed dwelling would be in keeping with the surrounding area and would not have a harmful impact on residential amenity or highway safety where appropriate planning conditions have been imposed to mitigate any harm identified. In accordance with Section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Planning Permission should therefore be granted having account of the following planning policies: “Saved” Policies – SDP1, SDP4, SDP5, SDP7, SDP9, SDP10, SDP11, SDP12, SDP13, H1, H2, and H7 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review - Adopted March 2006 as supported by the adopted LDF Core Strategy (2010) policies CS4, CS5, CS13, CS19, and CS20 and the Council’s current adopted Supplementary Planning Guidance. National Planning Guidance contained within PPS1 (Delivering Sustainable Development), PPS3 (Housing 2010) and PPG13 (Transport 2011) are also relevant to the ... view the full minutes text for item 111. |
|
Boldrewood (Building 62) Campus, University of Southampton - 11/00101/DIS PDF 328 KB
Report of the Planning and Development Manager, in respect of the application for approval of details reserved by conditions at the above address, attached.
Additional documents:
Minutes: Application for approval of details reserved by conditions 21 (Demolition and Construction Method Statement) and 22 (Bassett Crescent East) of planning permission reference 07/00985/OUT relating to the redevelopment of Boldrewood
Mr Luken (Agent) and Mr Carter, Mrs Cowie, Mr Moore and Mrs Wawman (Local Residents) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
The Panel considered the revised officer recommendation to delegate authority to the Planning and Development Manager to discharge conditions 21 and 22 of permission 07/00985/OUT subject to:-
(i) a screen to Oaklands Way (if required) be agreed in consultation with the Chair of the Planning and Rights of Way Panel; and (ii) that Condition 21 discharge be conditional upon the University of Southampton adhering to the revised Demolition and Construction Method Statement; and:
(a) 3 DUST monitoring stations being used on a real time 24/7 basis; (b) 3 VIBRATION monitoring stations being used on a real time 24/7 basis as required by Environmental Health in their email dated 14th February 2011; (c) ASBESTOS removal to be in accordance with HSE Standards; (d) 3 NOISE monitoring stations being used on a real time 24/7 basis; (e) HOURS OF WORKING as per 07/00985/OUT condition 20 with exceptions made in the event of poor weather forecast to allow on-site management; (f) No FLOODLIGHTING to be used with no light spill to extend beyond the site boundary; and (g) Measures regarding NESTING BIRDS (as detailed in email correspondence with LM (dated 10th February) being undertaken.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE REVISED OFFICER RECOMMENDATION THAT CONDITIONS 21 AND 22 OF PLANNING PERMISSION 07/00985/OUT, BE DISCHARGED FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE DEMOLITION PHASE OF THE BOLDREWOOD PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Letts, Osmond, Slade and Thomas ABSTAINED: Councillor Samuels
RESOLVED that authority be granted to the Planning and Development Manager to discharge Conditions 21 and 22 of Planning Permission 07/00985/OUT following the completion of the demolition phase of the Boldrewood project subject to the provision of a screen to Oaklands Way (if required); adhering to the revised Demolition and Construction Method Statement and the other measures set out (ii) above
REASONS FOR DECISION
The proposed method for demolishing the existing building is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Following the receipt of a revised Demolition and Construction Method Statement (DCMS) the submission is considered to address all the relevant points to ensure that the demolition phase proceeds with as little nuisance and disturbance to surrounding neighbours and the highway network as is possible. Reasonable checks and balances are included to enable the Local Planning Authority and Environmental Health to monitor the demolition phase and take action should it be necessary. Other material considerations, such as those listed in the report to and discussed at, the Council’s Planning and Rights of Way Panel on 15th February 2011 do not have sufficient ... view the full minutes text for item 112. |
|
Part of British American Tobacco Co Ltd, Regents Park Road - 10/01449/FUL PDF 478 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending delegated authority be granted in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Minutes: Redevelopment of the site to provide a warehouse club (13,006 square metres gross external floorspace) including tyre installation, sales and associated facilities with vehicular access from Regents Park Road.
Mr Cheesemore (Applicant) and Mr Dicks (Agent) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT ENTERING INTO A SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENT WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Osmond, Slade and Thomas ABSTAINED: Councillors Letts and Samuels
RESOLVED
(i) that authority be delegated to the Planning and Development Manager to grant conditional planning approval subject to:- a) the conditions in the report with any variations recommended by the Planning and Development Manager and the amended conditions below; b) the applicant entering into a Section 106 Legal Agreement to secure:- 1. Financial contributions towards site specific transport contributions for highway improvements in the vicinity of the site in line with Policy SDP4 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006), policies CS18 and CS25 of the adopted LDF Core Strategy (2010) and the adopted SPG relating to Planning Obligations (August 2005 as amended);
2. A financial contribution towards strategic transport projects for highway network improvements in the wider area in accordance with policies CS18 and CS25 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document - Adopted Version (January 2010) and the adopted SPG relating to Planning;
3. Submission of a Training and Employment Management Plan committing to adopting local labour and employment initiatives, in accordance with Policies CS24 and CS25 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document - Adopted Version (January 2010) and the adopted SPG relating to Planning Obligations (August 2005 as amended);
4. Submission and implementation within a specified timescale of a Travel Plan, in accordance with Policies CS18, CS19 and CS25 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document - Adopted Version (January 2010) and the adopted SPG relating to Planning Obligations (August 2005 as amended);
5. Submission of a highway condition survey to ensure any damage to the adjacent highway network attributable to the build process is repaired by the developer.
6. Secure the following operational controls in order to define the planning use:
· Both parties to the agreement acknowledge that the application is proposed on the basis that at least 65% of annual turnover will be to trade members of the warehouse club and therefore no more than 35% to individual members. · The warehouse club will restrict itself to not more than 4,000 different stock items. · Those items will be aimed primarily at the trade member and will mainly consist of items packaged in institutional packs or multi packs. · The agreement acknowledges that the use of the warehouse club as a Class A1 shop would amount to development requiring planning permission. · The warehouse club is to be operated in the general manner described in the booklet accompanying the application entitled “Costco Membership ... view the full minutes text for item 113. |
|
210 Bassett Green Road - 10/01774/FUL PDF 527 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Minutes: Redevelopment of the site by the erection of 4 x 5-Bedroom detached dwellings with associated garages, car parking, access and amenity space
Mr Tear (Agent), Mr Strother (North East Bassett Residents’ Association), and Mr Chamberlain, Mr Law, Mr Mounsell and Mrs Thakara (Local Residents) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION WAS LOST
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillor Thomas AGAINST: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Letts, Osmond, Samuels and Slade
A FURTHER MOTION proposed by Councillor Fitzhenry and seconded by Councillor Samuels ‘that the application be refused for the following reasons WAS CARRIED:-
(i) Character The proposed redevelopment of 210 Bassett Green Road with four dwellings, in the manner proposed, is considered to be a discordant form of development that would harm the established pattern of development that prevails within the area known locally as ‘Bassett Triangle’. The proposals, by reasons of their linear form, spatial characteristics and building-to-plot relationship (between themselves and their neighbours), the removal and erosion of a mature landscape screen onto Bassett Green Road to facilitate a second access point, and its subsequent residential density would exhibit a characteristic that differs from the prevailing pattern of development. Furthermore, the exclusion of garden land from the Government’s definition of previously developed land (as contained within PPS3 (2010)), and the subsequent shift in emphasis for housing delivery, makes the principle of the proposed development on this mature garden harder to justify. Taken together, these factors are considered to be symptomatic of an overdevelopment of the site which would harm the character of the area. As such, the development would prove contrary to the provisions of policy CS13 (1) (2) of the adopted Local Development Framework Core Strategy (January 2010) as supported by “saved” policies SDP7 and SDP9 (i) of the adopted City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and the guidance as set out in the Council’s approved Residential Design Guide SPD (September 2006) (namely, sections 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9).
(ii) Precedent The redevelopment proposals will, in the opinion of the City Council, harm the established pattern of development for the reason given above and by doing so would, if approved, set a difficult precedent that the Council would have difficulty in resisting for further inappropriate development within the Bassett Triangle. The ongoing acceptance of harmful redevelopment proposals would in isolation, and as part of a wider context, further reduce the spatial characteristics and harm the character of the area contrary to the policies and guidance cited above.
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Letts, Osmond, Samuels and Slade ABSTAINED: Councillor Thomas
RESOLVED that conditional planning permission be refused for the reasons set out above.
|
|
64 Swift Road - 10/01464/FUL PDF 354 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Additional documents:
Minutes: Erection of two storey rear and side extension to allow conversion of dwelling into four flats (2 x 2 bedroom and 2 x 1 bedroom) with associated parking and cycle/refuse storage.
Mr Rogers (Agent), Mr Johnson (Local Resident) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting. Mr Johnson also delivered a written statement from Councillor Cunio (Ward Councillor).
AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITION 1 WAS PROPOSED BY COUNCILLOR FITZHENRY AND SECONDED BY COUNCILLOR OSMOND TO AMEND THE PERIOD FOR COMMENCMENT OF WORKS TO THE 12TH JANUARY 2012
RECORDED VOTE FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Osmond, Slade and Thomas AGAINST: Councillor Samuels
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE REVISED OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION AS AMENDED WAS CARRIED
RECORDED VOTE: FOR: Councillors Fitzhenry, Jones, Osmond, Slade and Thomas AGAINST: Councillor Samuels
RESOLVED that planning approval be granted subject to the conditions in the report and the amended conditions set out below.
Amended Conditions
1- Physical works The development works hereby permitted shall begin not later than the 12th January 2012. REASON: To comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and to be consistent with the last Appeal consent granted, having regard to the current untidy and overgrown appearance of the site, which is detracting from the visual amenities of the area.
16 - Approved Plans Unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority, the development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans listed in the schedule attached below and be occupied as 2 x 2 bedrooms and 2 x 1 bedroom flats. No further additional bedrooms shall be created without first being approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. REASON: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning and to prevent a more intensive form of development from emerging without the proper consideration by the Local Planning Authority.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan and other guidance as set on the attached sheet. Other material considerations such as those listed in the report to the Planning and Rights of Way Panel on the 15.02.11 do not have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application. The proposed dwelling would be in keeping with the surrounding area and would not have a harmful impact on residential amenity or highway safety and having regard to the previous planning appeal decision the proposal is considered to be acceptable. Where appropriate planning conditions have been imposed to mitigate any harm identified. In accordance with Section 38 (6) of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Planning Permission should therefore be granted having account of the following planning policies: “Saved” Policies – SDP1, SDP4, SDP5, SDP7, SDP9, SDP10, SDP11, SDP12, SDP13, H1, H2, and H7 of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review - Adopted March 2006 as supported by the adopted LDF Core Strategy (2010) policies CS4, ... view the full minutes text for item 115. |
|
Elm Green Court, 58 Wilton Road - 10/01814/FUL PDF 345 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager, recommending conditional approval in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Additional documents:
Minutes: Alterations to roof comprising a mansard edge to reduce the eaves height of the building adjacent to 60 Wilton Road.
Mr MacLean (Agent) and Mrs Wiseman (Local Resident) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
RESOLVED that consideration of the application be deferred owing to unexpired response time for third parties. .
|
|
Unit K, West Quay Road - 10/01472/FUL PDF 282 KB Report of the Planning and Development Manager recommending delegated authority be granted in respect of the application for a proposed development at the above address, attached.
Minutes: Application for removal of condition 1 of planning permission 07/01214/VC to allow permanent use as a dance studio and variation of condition 4 to extend opening hours from 19.00 - 00.00 (Midnight) to 19.00 - 03.00 on Fridays and Saturdays and additional day time use of 08.00 - 19.00 Monday - Friday during school holidays. (Departure from Local Plan)
Mr Donahue (Agent) and Mr Rees (Applicant) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
UPON BEING PUT TO THE VOTE THE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL PLANNING PERMISSION SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT ENTERING INTO A SECTION 106 LEGAL AGREEMENT WAS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED
(i) that authority be delegated to the Planning and Development Manager to grant conditional planning approval subject to:-
(a) the conditions in the report;
(b) the applicant entering into a Section 106 Legal Agreement to secure:-
1. The continued implementation and monitoring of a travel plan to address the impact of the development; 2. The use, in the evening, of car parking areas of nearby properties for the benefit of the patrons of the dance studio; and, 3. A financial contribution towards site specific transport demands, namely a contribution towards Late Night Bus Services; and
(ii) that the Planning and Development Manager be authorised to refuse permission should the Section 106 Agreement not be completed within 28 days from the date of determination, on the ground of failure to secure the provisions of the Section 106 Agreement.
REASONS FOR DECISION
The application constitutes a departure form the Development Plan ('saved' Policy REI 1 (xiii) of the City of Southampton Local Plan March 2006 and CS7 of the Core Strategy January 2010), but is compliant with the other relevant Policies of the Development Plan set out below. However, on the basis of the low demand for industrial and warehouse use within this centre at this present time and the intention to create a major development quarter to expand the defined city centre boundary under policy CS2 of the Core Strategy it is considered appropriate to this location and to securing the future of the business for full consent to be granted. Policies - SDP1, SDP5, SDP7 and REI10 xiii of the City of Southampton Local Plan Review (March 2006) and CS3, CS7, CS13, CS19 and CS24 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (January 2010).
|
|
Option to Modify the Definitive Map and Statement PDF 66 KB Report of the Head of Planning and Sustainability regarding an option to modify the Definitive Map and Statement by adding a footpath at the rear of Lord’s Hill District Centre, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel considered the report of the Head of Planning and Sustainability regarding an option to modify the Definitive Map and Statement by adding a footpath at the rear of Lord’s Hill District Centre. (Copy of report circulated with the agenda and attached to the signed minutes).
Ms Toomey (Sainsbury) and Councillor Thomas (Ward Councillor) were present and with the consent of the Chair, addressed the meeting.
RESOLVED
(i) that the conclusions contained in the Safety Report, (Appendix 1), be accepted in that whilst there were risks associated with use of the original footpath, these were minimal and not as severe as to warrant its closure; (ii) that subject to Sainsbury’s meeting the full cost of the Combined Public Path Diversion Order and all relevant notifications and the resultant works; the original route, now designated a public right of way footpath, be diverted to an alignment as illustrated on Plan 1 contained within the report; (iii) that the Solicitor to the Council be authorised to make a Combined Public Path Diversion Order; and (iv) that the Planning and Development Manager be authorised to continue to liaise with Sainsbury in order to resolve the issue of the unauthorised palisade fence that has been erected.
NOTE: Councillor Thomas declared an interest and withdrew from the meeting for this item
|
|
Public Rights of Way: Annual Update Report PDF 63 KB Report of the Head of Planning and Sustainability providing an annual update on the main activities of the Council’s Rights of Way function, attached.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel received and noted the report of the Head of Planning and Sustainability regarding an annual update on the main activities of the Council’s Rights of Way function. (Copy of report circulated with the agenda and attached to the signed minutes).
|
|
Street Naming - Garage Site, Grateley Close PDF 49 KB Report of the Head of Planning and Sustainability, seeking approval for the proposed street name for the new housing development under construction on the former garage site at Grateley Close, Weston, attached Additional documents:
Minutes: The Panel considered the report of the Planning and Development Manager seeking approval for a street name for the new housing development under construction on the former garage site at Grateley Close, Weston. (Copy of report circulated with the agenda and attached to the signed minutes).
Whilst the officer recommendation was for the name Shire Horse Close; the Panel considered the suggestion proposed by Councillor Slade and seconded by Councillor Thomas, that the name ‘Mary Key Close’ be used in honour of the former Mayor and Ward Councillor.
RESOLVED that the name ‘Mary Key Close’ be approved for the new housing development under construction on the former garage site at Grateley Close, Weston.
|